GRID K240Q vs Quadro 3000M
When choosing between GRID K240Q and Quadro 3000M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K240Q and Quadro 3000M.
GRID K240Q
Quadro 3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M here:
Main Specs
| GRID K240Q | Quadro 3000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 200% more power consumption, than Quadro 3000M.
- GRID K240Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro 3000M has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GRID K240Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro 3000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro 3000M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 295 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
- GRID K240Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 3000M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 4375 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 160% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 155% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 56% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 51% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 94% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 122% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 77% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−105 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 250% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 260% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 37% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K240Q | Quadro 3000M | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Code name | GK104 | Fermi |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 22 February 2011 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 240 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 18.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 432.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 28 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |