GRID K240Q vs Quadro 5010M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K240Q and Quadro 5010M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K240Q stacks up against Quadro 5010M, check out specs charts below.
GRID K240Q
Quadro 5010M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 5010M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 5010M here:
Main Specs
| GRID K240Q | Quadro 5010M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 ECC |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 125% more power consumption, than Quadro 5010M.
- GRID K240Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 5010M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro 5010M has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GRID K240Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro 5010M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro 5010M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 295 MHz higher, than Quadro 5010M.
- GRID K240Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 5010M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 3700 MHz higher, than Quadro 5010M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 8% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 4% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K240Q and Quadro 5010M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GRID K240Q and Quadro 5010M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 5% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 5% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 12% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 2% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
| GRID K240Q and Quadro 5010M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| GRID K240Q and Quadro 5010M have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 5% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K240Q | Quadro 5010M | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Code name | GK104 | N12E-Q5 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 22 February 2011 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 21.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |