GRID K240Q vs Quadro 7000
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K240Q and Quadro 7000, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K240Q stacks up against Quadro 7000, check out specs charts below.
GRID K240Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro 7000
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Main Specs
GRID K240Q | Quadro 7000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 204 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
- GRID K240Q has 10% more power consumption, than Quadro 7000.
- GRID K240Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 7000 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro 7000 has 5 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro 7000 - with Fermi 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 94 MHz higher, than Quadro 7000.
- GRID K240Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 7000 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 1596 MHz higher, than Quadro 7000.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 80% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 110−120 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 35% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Dota 2 is 31% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Far Cry 5 is 71% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Fortnite is 54% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 68% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 47% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Minecraft is 11% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 26% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 53% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 66% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in World of Tanks is 12% more, than GRID K240Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K240Q | Quadro 7000 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | GK104 | GF110 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 2 May 2012 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 651 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 41.66 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 1,332 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3404 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 163.4 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | 3.0 | 2.0 |