GRID K240Q vs Quadro FX 4800
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K240Q and Quadro FX 4800, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K240Q stacks up against Quadro FX 4800, check out specs charts below.
GRID K240Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro FX 4800
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Main Specs
GRID K240Q | Quadro FX 4800 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1536 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
- GRID K240Q has 50% more power consumption, than Quadro FX 4800.
- GRID K240Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro FX 4800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1535 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro FX 4800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 143 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
- GRID K240Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 4800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 3400 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 187% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 61% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GRID K240Q and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 54% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 94% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 150% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 77% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 19% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 250% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
medium / 768p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 260% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 44% more, than Quadro FX 4800. |
Full Specs
GRID K240Q | Quadro FX 4800 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GK104 | GT200B |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 11 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 602 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 38.53 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | 3.0 | 1.3 |