GRID K240Q vs Quadro K2000
When choosing between GRID K240Q and Quadro K2000, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K240Q and Quadro K2000.
GRID K240Q
Main Specs
GRID K240Q
Quadro K2000
Power consumption (TDP)
225 Watt
51 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Check Price
GRID K240Q has 341% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000.
GRID K240Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K2000 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Quadro K2000 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K240Q and Quadro K2000 are build with Kepler architecture.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2000 is 209 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
GRID K240Q and Quadro K2000 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 1000 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
10−11
7−8
ultra / 1080p
6−7
4−5
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
16−18
medium / 1080p
12−14
9−10
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 44% more, than Quadro K2000.
high / 1080p
16−18
12−14
ultra / 1080p
14−16
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
24−27
medium / 1080p
18−20
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 46% more, than Quadro K2000.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GRID K240Q and Quadro K2000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
170−180
140−150
medium / 768p
140−150
110−120
ultra / 1080p
75−80
55−60
QHD / 1440p
40−45
30−35
4K / 2160p
30−33
27−30
high / 768p
110−120
85−90
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 25% more, than Quadro K2000.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
27−30
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro K2000.
low / 768p
95−100
80−85
medium / 768p
75−80
60−65
ultra / 1080p
45−50
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 23% more, than Quadro K2000.
high / 1080p
12−14
9−10
ultra / 1080p
10−12
8−9
4K / 2160p
4−5
4−5
low / 720p
27−30
20−22
medium / 1080p
12−14
9−10
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 40% more, than Quadro K2000.
high / 1080p
18−20
14−16
ultra / 1080p
14−16
10−12
low / 720p
75−80
60−65
medium / 1080p
35−40
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 32% more, than Quadro K2000.
high / 1080p
18−20
12−14
ultra / 1080p
14−16
10−12
QHD / 1440p
4−5
1−2
low / 720p
35−40
27−30
medium / 1080p
21−24
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 46% more, than Quadro K2000.
low / 768p
65−70
55−60
medium / 768p
60−65
45−50
high / 1080p
20−22
12−14
ultra / 1080p
9−10
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 29% more, than Quadro K2000.
high / 1080p
7−8
5−6
ultra / 1080p
5−6
3−4
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
20−22
12−14
medium / 1080p
9−10
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 42% more, than Quadro K2000.
low / 768p
100−110
95−100
high / 1080p
−
90−95
ultra / 1080p
90−95
80−85
medium / 1080p
100−105
90−95
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 11% more, than Quadro K2000.
high / 1080p
18−20
16−18
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
40−45
30−35
medium / 1080p
20−22
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than Quadro K2000.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
20−22
12−14
medium / 1080p
12−14
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 40% more, than Quadro K2000.
low / 768p
35−40
27−30
medium / 768p
24−27
18−20
high / 1080p
12−14
10−11
ultra / 1080p
8−9
6−7
4K / 2160p
7−8
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 28% more, than Quadro K2000.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
medium / 768p
50−55
45−50
ultra / 1080p
27−30
20−22
high / 768p
45−50
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 14% more, than Quadro K2000.
Full Specs
GRID K240Q
Quadro K2000
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Code name
GK104
GK107
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
28 June 2013
1 March 2013
Pipelines
1536
384
Core clock speed
745 MHz
954 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
95.36
30.53
Floating-point performance
2,289 gflops
732.7 gflops
Length
202 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160.0 GB/s
64 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.126
CUDA
3.0
3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
24 Mh/s
Check Price
