GRID K240Q vs Quadro K2100M
In this comparison between GRID K240Q and Quadro K2100M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K240Q will be the best choice, for others Quadro K2100M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K240Q
Quadro K2100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2100M here:
Main Specs
| GRID K240Q | Quadro K2100M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 309% more power consumption, than Quadro K2100M.
- GRID K240Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K2100M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K2100M has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GRID K240Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro K2100M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K240Q and Quadro K2100M are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 78 MHz higher, than Quadro K2100M.
- GRID K240Q and Quadro K2100M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 2000 MHz higher, than Quadro K2100M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 62% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 69% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K240Q and Quadro K2100M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 40% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 34% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 42% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 58% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 42% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 14% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 55% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 61% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 19% more, than Quadro K2100M. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K240Q | Quadro K2100M | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | GK104 | GK106 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 576 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 667 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 2,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 32.02 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 768.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 48.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 38 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |