GRID K240Q vs Quadro K2200
In this comparison between GRID K240Q and Quadro K2200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K240Q will be the best choice, for others Quadro K2200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K240Q
Main Specs
GRID K240Q
Quadro K2200
Power consumption (TDP)
225 Watt
68 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Check Price
GRID K240Q has 230% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200.
GRID K240Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K2200 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Quadro K2200 has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro K2200 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2200 is 301 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
GRID K240Q and Quadro K2200 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200 is 12 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
10−11
18−20
ultra / 1080p
6−7
10−11
QHD / 1440p
1−2
5−6
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
21−24
35−40
medium / 1080p
12−14
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 90% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p
16−18
27−30
ultra / 1080p
14−16
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
35−40
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p
170−180
220−230
medium / 768p
140−150
190−200
ultra / 1080p
75−80
110−120
QHD / 1440p
40−45
75−80
4K / 2160p
30−33
40−45
high / 768p
110−120
160−170
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 40% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
27−30
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p
95−100
110−120
medium / 768p
75−80
100−110
ultra / 1080p
45−50
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Dota 2 is 33% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p
12−14
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−12
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
4−5
7−8
low / 720p
27−30
45−50
medium / 1080p
12−14
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Far Cry 5 is 71% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p
18−20
27−30
ultra / 1080p
14−16
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
75−80
110−120
medium / 1080p
35−40
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Fortnite is 56% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p
18−20
30−35
ultra / 1080p
14−16
21−24
QHD / 1440p
4−5
10−12
low / 720p
35−40
60−65
medium / 1080p
21−24
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 73% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p
65−70
95−100
medium / 768p
60−65
85−90
high / 1080p
20−22
35−40
ultra / 1080p
9−10
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 47% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p
7−8
10−12
ultra / 1080p
5−6
9−10
4K / 2160p
1−2
2−3
low / 720p
20−22
35−40
medium / 1080p
9−10
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
ultra / 1080p
90−95
−
medium / 1080p
100−105
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Minecraft is 11% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
40−45
65−70
medium / 1080p
20−22
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 26% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
20−22
35−40
medium / 1080p
12−14
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 53% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p
35−40
65−70
medium / 768p
24−27
40−45
high / 1080p
12−14
21−24
ultra / 1080p
8−9
12−14
4K / 2160p
7−8
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 66% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
50−55
60−65
ultra / 1080p
27−30
35−40
high / 768p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200 in World of Tanks is 12% more, than GRID K240Q.
Full Specs
GRID K240Q
Quadro K2200
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell
Code name
GK104
GM107
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
28 June 2013
22 July 2014
Pipelines
1536
640
Core clock speed
745 MHz
1046 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
95.36
44.96
Floating-point performance
2,289 gflops
1,439 gflops
Length
202 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160.0 GB/s
80.19 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.126
CUDA
3.0
5.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
162 Mh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
1.6 Mh/s
Check Price
