GRID K240Q vs Quadro K4100M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K240Q and Quadro K4100M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K240Q stacks up against Quadro K4100M, check out specs charts below.
GRID K240Q
Quadro K4100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K4100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4100M here:
Main Specs
| GRID K240Q | Quadro K4100M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 125% more power consumption, than Quadro K4100M.
- GRID K240Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K4100M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Quadro K4100M has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GRID K240Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro K4100M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K240Q and Quadro K4100M are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 39 MHz higher, than Quadro K4100M.
- GRID K240Q and Quadro K4100M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 1800 MHz higher, than Quadro K4100M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Battlefield 5 is 13% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K240Q and Quadro K4100M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 180−190 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 150−160 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 7% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Dota 2 is 8% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Far Cry 5 is 14% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Fortnite is 13% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 15% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 7% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Metro Exodus is 11% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Minecraft is 2% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 11% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4100M in World of Tanks is 5% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K240Q | Quadro K4100M | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | GK104 | N15E-Q3-A2 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 1152 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 706 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 67.78 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 1,627 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 102.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 51 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |