GRID K240Q vs Quadro M2200
When comparing GRID K240Q and Quadro M2200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K240Q and Quadro M2200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K240Q
Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2200 here:
Main Specs
GRID K240Q | Quadro M2200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 55 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 309% more power consumption, than Quadro M2200.
- Quadro M2200 has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GRID K240Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2200 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M2200 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 51 MHz higher, than Quadro M2200.
- GRID K240Q and Quadro M2200 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 508 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 130% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Battlefield 5 is 113% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 240−250 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 210−220 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 61% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Dota 2 is 47% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Far Cry 5 is 114% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Fortnite is 89% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 115% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 77% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Metro Exodus is 122% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Minecraft is 16% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 42% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 84% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 116% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in World of Tanks is 14% more, than GRID K240Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K240Q | Quadro M2200 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
Code name | GK104 | N17P-Q3 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 13 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 694 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1870 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5508 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 88 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
3D Stereo | + | |
Check Price |