GRID K240Q vs Quadro M520
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID K240Q and Quadro M520. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID K240Q and Quadro M520. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K240Q
Quadro M520 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M520 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M520 here:
Main Specs
GRID K240Q | Quadro M520 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 25 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 800% more power consumption, than Quadro M520.
- Quadro M520 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GRID K240Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro M520 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M520 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M520 is 11 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
- GRID K240Q and Quadro M520 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 8% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 15% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K240Q and Quadro M520 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 8% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 5% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 11% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 12% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 2% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
GRID K240Q and Quadro M520 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 8% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 5% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Quadro M520. |
Full Specs
GRID K240Q | Quadro M520 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
Code name | GK104 | |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 13 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 756 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1019 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 40 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
3D Stereo | + | |
Check Price |