GRID K240Q vs Quadro T1000 Max Q
When comparing GRID K240Q and Quadro T1000 Max Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K240Q and Quadro T1000 Max Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K240Q
Quadro T1000 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro T1000 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T1000 Max Q here:
Main Specs
| GRID K240Q | Quadro T1000 Max Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro T1000 Max Q has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GRID K240Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro T1000 Max Q - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro T1000 Max Q - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 Max Q is 50 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
- GRID K240Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro T1000 Max Q - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 Max Q is 3000 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 260% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 209% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 110−120 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 82% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Dota 2 is 55% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 235% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Fortnite is 175% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 231% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 132% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 244% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Minecraft is 26% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 244% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 Max Q in World of Tanks is 21% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K240Q | Quadro T1000 Max Q | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Turing |
| Code name | GK104 | N19P-Q1 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 27 May 2019 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 795 / 1230 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 8000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |