GRID K240Q vs Radeon 520
When comparing GRID K240Q and Radeon 520, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K240Q and Radeon 520 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K240Q
Radeon 520 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon 520 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon 520 here:
Main Specs
GRID K240Q | Radeon 520 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 350% more power consumption, than Radeon 520.
- GRID K240Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon 520 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon 520 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GRID K240Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon 520 - in Laptops.
- GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon 520 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon 520 is 285 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
- GRID K240Q and Radeon 520 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 2750 MHz higher, than Radeon 520.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2100% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon 520 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | − |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
high / 768p | 110−120 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 357% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon 520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 200% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 250% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 252% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−105 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 36% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 210% more, than Radeon 520. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
low / 768p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 24−27 | − |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 156% more, than Radeon 520. |
Full Specs
GRID K240Q | Radeon 520 | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GK104 | Oland |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 21 March 2017 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 320 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 1030 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,040 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 20.60 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 659.2 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2250 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 16 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12.0 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | + |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Check Price |