GRID K240Q vs Radeon E8860
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID K240Q and Radeon E8860. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID K240Q and Radeon E8860. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K240Q
Radeon E8860
Main Specs
GRID K240Q | Radeon E8860 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 37 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
- GRID K240Q has 508% more power consumption, than Radeon E8860.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon E8860 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon E8860 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 170 MHz higher, than Radeon E8860.
- GRID K240Q and Radeon E8860 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 500 MHz higher, than Radeon E8860.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 30% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 46% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K240Q and Radeon E8860 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 25% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 23% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 40% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 32% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 46% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 29% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 42% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 11% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 40% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 28% more, than Radeon E8860. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 14% more, than Radeon E8860. |
Full Specs
GRID K240Q | Radeon E8860 | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GK104 | Venus |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 25 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 575 MHz |
Boost Clock | 625 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 25.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |