GRID K240Q vs Radeon HD 6950

In this comparison between GRID K240Q and Radeon HD 6950 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K240Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 6950 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Main Specs

  GRID K240Q Radeon HD 6950
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 500 Watt
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors 2x 6-pin
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
  Check Price
  • Radeon HD 6950 has 122% more power consumption, than GRID K240Q.
  • GRID K240Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 6950 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
  • Radeon HD 6950 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
  • Both cards are used in Desktops.
  • GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon HD 6950 - with TeraScale 3.
  • GRID K240Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 6950 - by 40 nm process technology.
  • Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 3750 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6950.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 10−11 14−16
ultra / 1080p 6−7 8−9
QHD / 1440p 1−2 3−4
low / 720p 21−24 27−30
medium / 1080p 12−14 16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 40% more, than GRID K240Q.

Full Specs

  GRID K240Q Radeon HD 6950
Architecture Kepler TeraScale 3
Code name GK104 Cayman
Type Workstation Desktop
Release date 28 June 2013 14 December 2010
Pipelines 1536 1408
Core clock speed 745 MHz
Boost Clock 800 MHz
Transistor count 3,540 million 2,640 million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Texture fill rate 95.36 70.40
Floating-point performance 2,289 gflops 2,252.8 gflops
Length 267 mm
Memory bus width 256 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz 1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth 160.0 GB/s
DirectX 12 (11_0)
Shader Model 5.1 5.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.4
OpenCL 1.2 1.2
Vulkan 1.1.126
CUDA 3.0
Bus support PCIe 2.0 x16
HDMI +
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 244 Mh/s
Eyefinity +
Design reference
CrossFire +
  Check Price