GRID K240Q vs Radeon Pro Vega 16
When comparing GRID K240Q and Radeon Pro Vega 16, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K240Q and Radeon Pro Vega 16 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K240Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon Pro Vega 16 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro Vega 16 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro Vega 16 here:
Main Specs
GRID K240Q | Radeon Pro Vega 16 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 200% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon Pro Vega 16 has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GRID K240Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - with Vega.
- GRID K240Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 2600 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Battlefield 5 is 113% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 240−250 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 210−220 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
high / 768p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 61% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Dota 2 is 47% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Far Cry 5 is 128% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Fortnite is 91% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Forza Horizon 4 is 126% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Grand Theft Auto V is 80% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Metro Exodus is 122% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Minecraft is 16% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 46% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 122% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in World of Tanks is 18% more, than GRID K240Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K240Q | Radeon Pro Vega 16 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Vega |
Code name | GK104 | Vega Mobile |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 15 November 2018 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1190 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 76.16 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 1024 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2400 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 307.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |