GRID K240Q vs Radeon PRO WX 3100
When comparing GRID K240Q and Radeon PRO WX 3100, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K240Q and Radeon PRO WX 3100 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K240Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon PRO WX 3100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 3100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 3100 here:
Main Specs
GRID K240Q | Radeon PRO WX 3100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 246% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 3100.
- GRID K240Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GRID K240Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - with Polaris.
- GRID K240Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 3100 is 1000 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 40% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Battlefield 5 is 27% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K240Q and Radeon PRO WX 3100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Far Cry 5 is 28% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Fortnite is 21% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 26% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 20% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Minecraft is 8% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 23% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 33% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in World of Tanks is 12% more, than GRID K240Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K240Q | Radeon PRO WX 3100 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Polaris |
Code name | GK104 | Polaris 12 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 21 March 2017 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 2,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 39.01 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |