GRID K240Q vs Radeon Pro WX 3200
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID K240Q and Radeon Pro WX 3200. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID K240Q and Radeon Pro WX 3200. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K240Q
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 3200 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K240Q | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 246% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
- GRID K240Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GRID K240Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 337 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
- GRID K240Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 1000 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 30% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K240Q and Radeon Pro WX 3200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Far Cry 5 is 21% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Fortnite is 18% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 26% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 12% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Metro Exodus is 11% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−105 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 22% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in World of Tanks is 9% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K240Q | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Polaris |
| Code name | GK104 | Polaris 12 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 26 September 2019 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 1082 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 41.44 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |