GRID K240Q vs Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge
In this comparison between GRID K240Q and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K240Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K240Q
Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge here:
Main Specs
| GRID K240Q | Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 12-45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 1775% more power consumption, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge.
- GRID K240Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge - in Laptops.
- GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge - with GCN 1.2/2.0.
- GRID K240Q and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 120% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K240Q and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 52% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 37% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 128% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 60% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 109% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 68% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−105 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 133% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 125% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 41% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K240Q | Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.2/2.0 |
| Code name | GK104 | Bristol Ridge |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 1 June 2016 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 800 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3100 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12 (FL 12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |