GRID K240Q vs Radeon R7 M350

In this comparison between GRID K240Q and Radeon R7 M350 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K240Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M350 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GRID K240Q

Radeon R7 M350

Main Specs

	GRID K240Q	Radeon R7 M350
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	35 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs

GRID K240Q has 542% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 M350.
GRID K240Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M350 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon R7 M350 has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M350 - with GCN 1.0.
Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 20 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.
GRID K240Q and Radeon R7 M350 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 4000 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M350.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	10−11	2−3
ultra / 1080p	6−7	0−1
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	12−14
medium / 1080p	12−14	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
high / 1080p	16−18	−
ultra / 1080p	14−16	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	35−40	16−18
medium / 1080p	18−20	6−7
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 155% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GRID K240Q and Radeon R7 M350 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	170−180	120−130
medium / 768p	140−150	95−100
ultra / 1080p	75−80	40−45
QHD / 1440p	40−45	24−27
4K / 2160p	30−33	18−20
high / 768p	110−120	65−70
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 56% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
low / 768p	55−60	85−90
ultra / 1080p	27−30	18−20
medium / 1080p	45−50	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M350 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	95−100	75−80
medium / 768p	75−80	50−55
ultra / 1080p	45−50	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 45% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
high / 1080p	12−14	2−3
ultra / 1080p	10−12	2−3
4K / 2160p	4−5	1−2
low / 720p	27−30	12−14
medium / 1080p	12−14	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
high / 1080p	18−20	10−11
ultra / 1080p	14−16	5−6
QHD / 1440p	−	2−3
low / 720p	75−80	50−55
medium / 1080p	35−40	12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 85% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
high / 1080p	18−20	4−5
ultra / 1080p	14−16	−
QHD / 1440p	4−5	0−1
low / 720p	35−40	18−20
medium / 1080p	21−24	7−8
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 160% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
low / 768p	65−70	45−50
medium / 768p	60−65	−
high / 1080p	20−22	5−6
ultra / 1080p	9−10	2−3
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 77% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
high / 1080p	7−8	1−2
ultra / 1080p	5−6	0−1
4K / 2160p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	20−22	5−6
medium / 1080p	9−10	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
low / 768p	100−110	90−95
high / 1080p	−	85−90
ultra / 1080p	90−95	70−75
medium / 1080p	100−105	90−95
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 17% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
high / 1080p	18−20	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	12−14
low / 720p	40−45	27−30
medium / 1080p	20−22	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
high / 1080p	12−14	−
ultra / 1080p	8−9	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	20−22	6−7
medium / 1080p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 180% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
low / 768p	35−40	12−14
medium / 768p	24−27	9−10
high / 1080p	12−14	4−5
ultra / 1080p	8−9	3−4
4K / 2160p	7−8	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than Radeon R7 M350.
low / 768p	90−95	75−80
medium / 768p	50−55	35−40
ultra / 1080p	27−30	16−18
high / 768p	45−50	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 34% more, than Radeon R7 M350.

Full Specs

	GRID K240Q	Radeon R7 M350
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 1.0
Code name	GK104	Opal
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	28 June 2013	5 May 2015
Pipelines	1536	384
Core clock speed	745 MHz	725 MHz
Boost Clock		825 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	950 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	19.80
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops	779.5 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	1.2	Not Listed
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Eyefinity		+
HD3D		+
PowerTune		+
DualGraphics		+
ZeroCore		+
Switchable graphics		+
Mantle		+
Compute units		6

GRID K240Q vs Radeon R7 M350

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares