GRID K240Q vs Radeon R8 M365DX
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K240Q and Radeon R8 M365DX, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K240Q stacks up against Radeon R8 M365DX, check out specs charts below.
GRID K240Q
Radeon R8 M365DX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R8 M365DX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R8 M365DX here:
Main Specs
| GRID K240Q | Radeon R8 M365DX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K240Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R8 M365DX uses IGP interface.
- GRID K240Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon R8 M365DX - in Laptops.
- GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R8 M365DX - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 25 MHz higher, than Radeon R8 M365DX.
- GRID K240Q and Radeon R8 M365DX are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 4200 MHz higher, than Radeon R8 M365DX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2100% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R8 M365DX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 110−120 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 357% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R8 M365DX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 200% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 250% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 252% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−105 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 36% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 425% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | − |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 156% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K240Q | Radeon R8 M365DX | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN |
| Code name | GK104 | Meso |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 3 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 720 / 1125 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1125 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 27.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 + 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 800 / 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |