GRID K240Q vs Radeon RX 640
In this comparison between GRID K240Q and Radeon RX 640 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K240Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX 640 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K240Q
Radeon RX 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX 640 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K240Q | Radeon RX 640 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 350% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 640.
- GRID K240Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon RX 640 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon RX 640 has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GRID K240Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX 640 - in Laptops.
- GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon RX 640 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX 640 is 473 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
- GRID K240Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 640 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 640 is 1000 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 42% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 57% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K240Q and Radeon RX 640 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 40% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 29% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 55% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 51% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 62% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| medium / 720p | − | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 39% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−105 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 12% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 70% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 80% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 25% more, than Radeon RX 640. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K240Q | Radeon RX 640 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Polaris |
| Code name | GK104 | Polaris 12 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 12 August 2019 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 1218 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1218 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 38.98 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 112.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |