GRID K240Q vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
When comparing GRID K240Q and Radeon RX Vega M GL, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K240Q and Radeon RX Vega M GL is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K240Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon RX Vega M GL is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega M GL is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega M GL here:
Main Specs
GRID K240Q | Radeon RX Vega M GL | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 246% more power consumption, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
- GRID K240Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon RX Vega M GL uses IGP interface.
- Radeon RX Vega M GL has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GRID K240Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - in Laptops.
- GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX Vega M GL is 186 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
- GRID K240Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 3600 MHz higher, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 80% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 110−120 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 34% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Dota 2 is 31% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Far Cry 5 is 64% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Fortnite is 54% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Forza Horizon 4 is 68% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Grand Theft Auto V is 47% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Metro Exodus is 55% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Minecraft is 11% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 26% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 46% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 61% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in World of Tanks is 12% more, than GRID K240Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K240Q | Radeon RX Vega M GL | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | GK104 | Polaris 22 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 1 February 2018 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 931 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1011 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 5,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 80.88 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 2,588 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 1024 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Check Price |