GRID K240Q vs Tesla C2075
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K240Q and Tesla C2075, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K240Q stacks up against Tesla C2075, check out specs charts below.
GRID K240Q
Main Specs
GRID K240Q
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
225 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 9% more power consumption, than GRID K240Q.
GRID K240Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 5 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 171 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
GRID K240Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 1868 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
10−11
16−18
ultra / 1080p
6−7
10−11
QHD / 1440p
1−2
4−5
low / 720p
21−24
35−40
medium / 1080p
12−14
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 80% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p
16−18
27−30
ultra / 1080p
14−16
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
35−40
55−60
medium / 1080p
18−20
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 59% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p
170−180
210−220
medium / 768p
140−150
190−200
ultra / 1080p
75−80
100−110
QHD / 1440p
40−45
65−70
4K / 2160p
30−33
30−35
high / 768p
110−120
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 31% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
27−30
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p
95−100
110−120
medium / 768p
75−80
100−110
ultra / 1080p
45−50
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 31% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p
12−14
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−12
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
4−5
6−7
low / 720p
27−30
45−50
medium / 1080p
12−14
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 64% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p
18−20
27−30
ultra / 1080p
14−16
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
75−80
110−120
medium / 1080p
35−40
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 54% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p
18−20
27−30
ultra / 1080p
14−16
21−24
QHD / 1440p
4−5
10−11
low / 720p
35−40
60−65
medium / 1080p
21−24
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 63% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p
65−70
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
80−85
high / 1080p
20−22
30−35
ultra / 1080p
9−10
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 37% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p
7−8
10−12
ultra / 1080p
5−6
8−9
4K / 2160p
1−2
1−2
low / 720p
20−22
30−35
medium / 1080p
9−10
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 44% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
ultra / 1080p
90−95
−
medium / 1080p
100−105
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 11% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
40−45
60−65
medium / 1080p
20−22
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 23% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
20−22
30−35
medium / 1080p
12−14
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 46% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p
35−40
60−65
medium / 768p
24−27
35−40
high / 1080p
12−14
21−24
ultra / 1080p
8−9
12−14
4K / 2160p
7−8
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 55% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
50−55
60−65
ultra / 1080p
27−30
35−40
high / 768p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 12% more, than GRID K240Q.
Full Specs
GRID K240Q
Tesla C2075
Architecture
Kepler
Fermi 2.0
Code name
GK104
GF110
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
28 June 2013
25 July 2011
Pipelines
1536
448
Core clock speed
745 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
95.36
32.14
Floating-point performance
2,289 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
248 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160.0 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.126
N/A
CUDA
3.0
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
94 Mh/s
Check Price
