GRID K240Q vs Tesla M60
In this comparison between GRID K240Q and Tesla M60 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K240Q will be the best choice, for others Tesla M60 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K240Q
Tesla M60
Main Specs
| GRID K240Q | Tesla M60 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- Tesla M60 has 33% more power consumption, than GRID K240Q.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla M60 has 7 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla M60 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 188 MHz higher, than Tesla M60.
- GRID K240Q and Tesla M60 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M60 is 12 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 280% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Battlefield 5 is 231% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 110−120 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 82% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Dota 2 is 55% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Far Cry 5 is 257% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Fortnite is 186% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Forza Horizon 4 is 247% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Grand Theft Auto V is 142% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Minecraft is 26% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 192% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 255% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M60 in World of Tanks is 22% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K240Q | Tesla M60 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | GK104 | GM204 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 150.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 2x 4,833 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | 5.2 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 432 Mh/s | |