GRID K240Q vs UHD Graphics 615
When choosing between GRID K240Q and UHD Graphics 615, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K240Q and UHD Graphics 615.
GRID K240Q
UHD Graphics 615 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: UHD Graphics 615 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with UHD Graphics 615 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K240Q | UHD Graphics 615 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 1400% more power consumption, than UHD Graphics 615.
- GRID K240Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and UHD Graphics 615 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- GRID K240Q is used in Desktops, and UHD Graphics 615 - in Laptops.
- GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and UHD Graphics 615 - with Gen. 9 Amber Lake.
- Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 445 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics 615.
- GRID K240Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics 615 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 360% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 615 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 83% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GRID K240Q and UHD Graphics 615 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 68% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 126% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 333% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 2000% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−105 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 20% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 600% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 525% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 48% more, than UHD Graphics 615. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K240Q | UHD Graphics 615 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 9 Amber Lake |
| Code name | GK104 | Kaby-Lake GT2 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 30 August 2018 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 24 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 25.20 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.103 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |