GRID K240Q vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
When comparing GRID K240Q and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K240Q and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K240Q
UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU here:
Main Specs
GRID K240Q | UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GRID K240Q is used in Desktops, and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU - in Laptops.
- GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 445 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU.
- GRID K240Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 44% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 46% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K240Q and UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 32% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 29% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 55% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 37% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 46% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 37% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 11% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 40% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 38% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 17% more, than UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU. |
Full Specs
GRID K240Q | UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU | |
Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | GK104 | Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 28 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 32 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GRID K240Q vs Radeon HD 7770
- GRID K240Q vs Radeon RX Vega 11
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs Radeon HD 7770
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs Radeon RX Vega 11
- GRID K240Q vs Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri
- GRID K240Q vs Iris Plus Graphics 640
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs Radeon R7 512 Cores Kaveri
- UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU vs Iris Plus Graphics 640