FirePro M4150 vs GRID K260Q

When choosing between FirePro M4150 and GRID K260Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M4150 and GRID K260Q.

FirePro M4150

GRID K260Q

Main Specs

	FirePro M4150	GRID K260Q
Power consumption (TDP)		225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs

FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID K260Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GRID K260Q has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GRID K260Q - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GRID K260Q is 30 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
FirePro M4150 and GRID K260Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 1000 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	2−3	14−16
ultra / 1080p	0−1	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	12−14	30−35
medium / 1080p	3−4	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	5−6	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	14−16	50−55
medium / 1080p	6−7	27−30
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 277% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	120−130	210−220
medium / 768p	90−95	180−190
ultra / 1080p	35−40	95−100
QHD / 1440p	21−24	50−55
4K / 2160p	16−18	30−33
high / 768p	65−70	140−150
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 101% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	65−70	55−60
ultra / 1080p	18−20	40−45
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
medium / 768p	45−50	90−95
ultra / 1080p	20−22	60−65
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 87% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	2−3	18−20
ultra / 1080p	2−3	16−18
4K / 2160p	2−3	6−7
low / 720p	10−12	35−40
medium / 1080p	3−4	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	10−11	24−27
ultra / 1080p	5−6	18−20
QHD / 1440p	3−4	16−18
low / 720p	50−55	95−100
medium / 1080p	10−12	50−55
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 162% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	5−6	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	20−22
QHD / 1440p	3−4	9−10
4K / 2160p	2−3	−
low / 720p	18−20	50−55
medium / 1080p	8−9	27−30
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 222% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	45−50	85−90
medium / 768p	−	75−80
high / 1080p	4−5	30−33
ultra / 1080p	2−3	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
medium / 720p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	1−2	9−10
ultra / 1080p	0−1	7−8
4K / 2160p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	4−5	27−30
medium / 1080p	3−4	12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	90−95	110−120
high / 1080p	80−85	−
ultra / 1080p	70−75	100−110
medium / 1080p	85−90	100−110
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 28% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	12−14	18−20
low / 720p	27−30	55−60
medium / 1080p	14−16	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than FirePro M4150.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	6−7	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 366% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	9−10	55−60
medium / 768p	8−9	30−35
high / 1080p	4−5	18−20
ultra / 1080p	4−5	10−12
4K / 2160p	1−2	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 400% more, than FirePro M4150.
low / 768p	70−75	100−110
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	14−16	35−40
high / 768p	30−35	50−55
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 64% more, than FirePro M4150.

Full Specs

	FirePro M4150	GRID K260Q
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Kepler
Code name	Opal	GK104
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	16 October 2013	28 June 2013
Pipelines	384	1536
Core clock speed	715 MHz	745 MHz
Transistor count	950 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	17.16	95.36
Floating-point performance	549.1 gflops	2,289 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA		3.0

FirePro M4150 vs GRID K260Q

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares