FirePro V7900 vs GRID K260Q

In this comparison between FirePro V7900 and GRID K260Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V7900 will be the best choice, for others GRID K260Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro V7900 Check Price

GRID K260Q

Main Specs

	FirePro V7900	GRID K260Q
Power consumption (TDP)	151 Watt	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price

GRID K260Q has 49% more power consumption, than FirePro V7900.
FirePro V7900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID K260Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
FirePro V7900 and GRID K260Q have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V7900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and GRID K260Q - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GRID K260Q is 20 MHz higher, than FirePro V7900.
FirePro V7900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K260Q - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro V7900 and GRID K260Q is 5000 MHz.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	10−12	14−16
ultra / 1080p	6−7	9−10
QHD / 1440p	1−2	3−4
low / 720p	24−27	30−35
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 36% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	18−20	24−27
ultra / 1080p	14−16	21−24
QHD / 1440p	1−2	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	35−40	50−55
medium / 1080p	20−22	27−30
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro V7900 and GRID K260Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	180−190	210−220
medium / 768p	150−160	180−190
ultra / 1080p	75−80	95−100
QHD / 1440p	45−50	50−55
4K / 2160p	30−33	30−33
high / 768p	110−120	140−150
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	30−33	40−45
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	95−100	110−120
medium / 768p	80−85	90−95
ultra / 1080p	50−55	60−65
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 16% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	12−14	18−20
ultra / 1080p	12−14	16−18
4K / 2160p	5−6	6−7
low / 720p	30−33	35−40
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 26% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	20−22	24−27
ultra / 1080p	14−16	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
low / 720p	80−85	95−100
medium / 1080p	35−40	50−55
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 23% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	18−20	24−27
ultra / 1080p	14−16	20−22
QHD / 1440p	5−6	9−10
low / 720p	40−45	50−55
medium / 1080p	21−24	27−30
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 35% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	70−75	85−90
medium / 768p	60−65	75−80
high / 1080p	21−24	30−33
ultra / 1080p	9−10	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	7−8	9−10
ultra / 1080p	5−6	7−8
4K / 2160p	1−2	2−3
low / 720p	21−24	27−30
medium / 1080p	9−10	12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	100−110	110−120
ultra / 1080p	90−95	100−110
medium / 1080p	100−105	100−110
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 8% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	20−22	21−24
ultra / 1080p	16−18	18−20
low / 720p	45−50	55−60
medium / 1080p	21−24	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 14% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	12−14	14−16
ultra / 1080p	8−9	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	27−30
medium / 1080p	12−14	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 21% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	40−45	55−60
medium / 768p	24−27	30−35
high / 1080p	14−16	18−20
ultra / 1080p	8−9	10−12
4K / 2160p	7−8	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 31% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	95−100	100−110
medium / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	27−30	35−40
high / 768p	45−50	50−55
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 12% more, than FirePro V7900.

Full Specs

	FirePro V7900	GRID K260Q
Architecture	TeraScale 3	Kepler
Code name	Cayman	GK104
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	24 May 2011	28 June 2013
Pipelines	1280	1536
Core clock speed	725 MHz	745 MHz
Transistor count	2,640 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	58.00	95.36
Floating-point performance	1,856.0 gflops	2,289 gflops
Length	279 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA		3.0
Bus support	PCIe 2.1 x16
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	171 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
StereoOutput3D	+
DisplayPort count	4
Dual-link DVI support	+
	Check Price

FirePro V7900 vs GRID K260Q

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares