FirePro W7000 vs GRID K260Q

When comparing FirePro W7000 and GRID K260Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W7000 and GRID K260Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

FirePro W7000 Check Price

GRID K260Q

Main Specs

	FirePro W7000	GRID K260Q
Power consumption (TDP)	350 Watt	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price

FirePro W7000 has 55% more power consumption, than GRID K260Q.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
FirePro W7000 has 2 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro W7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GRID K260Q - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of FirePro W7000 is 205 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
FirePro W7000 and GRID K260Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 200 MHz higher, than FirePro W7000.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	21−24	14−16
ultra / 1080p	12−14	9−10
QHD / 1440p	6−7	3−4
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	40−45	30−35
medium / 1080p	24−27	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 46% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	30−35	24−27
ultra / 1080p	27−30	21−24
QHD / 1440p	12−14	7−8
4K / 2160p	8−9	5−6
low / 720p	65−70	50−55
medium / 1080p	35−40	27−30
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Battlefield 5 is 34% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	230−240	210−220
medium / 768p	200−210	180−190
ultra / 1080p	120−130	95−100
QHD / 1440p	90−95	50−55
4K / 2160p	50−55	30−33
high / 768p	170−180	140−150
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	60−65	55−60
ultra / 1080p	50−55	40−45
medium / 1080p	55−60	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	120−130	110−120
medium / 768p	100−110	90−95
ultra / 1080p	80−85	60−65
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Dota 2 is 15% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	18−20
ultra / 1080p	21−24	16−18
QHD / 1440p	18−20	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	6−7
low / 720p	50−55	35−40
medium / 1080p	27−30	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Far Cry 5 is 42% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	30−35	24−27
ultra / 1080p	24−27	18−20
QHD / 1440p	16−18	16−18
low / 720p	120−130	95−100
medium / 1080p	70−75	50−55
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Fortnite is 28% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	35−40	24−27
ultra / 1080p	27−30	20−22
QHD / 1440p	14−16	9−10
4K / 2160p	12−14	−
low / 720p	70−75	50−55
medium / 1080p	40−45	27−30
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 44% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	100−110	85−90
medium / 768p	95−100	75−80
high / 1080p	40−45	30−33
ultra / 1080p	16−18	12−14
QHD / 1440p	7−8	3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	12−14	9−10
ultra / 1080p	10−11	7−8
QHD / 1440p	10−11	−
4K / 2160p	3−4	2−3
low / 720p	40−45	27−30
medium / 1080p	18−20	12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Metro Exodus is 41% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	120−130	110−120
ultra / 1080p	−	100−110
medium / 1080p	110−120	100−110
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Minecraft is 9% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	14−16	18−20
low / 720p	70−75	55−60
medium / 1080p	18−20	24−27
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 2% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	16−18	14−16
ultra / 1080p	10−11	9−10
QHD / 1440p	2−3	0−1
4K / 2160p	1−2	−
low / 720p	40−45	27−30
medium / 1080p	21−24	16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 35% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	75−80	55−60
medium / 768p	45−50	30−35
high / 1080p	24−27	18−20
ultra / 1080p	14−16	10−12
4K / 2160p	8−9	8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 36% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	90−95	100−110
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	35−40
high / 768p	55−60	50−55
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 1% more, than FirePro W7000.

Full Specs

	FirePro W7000	GRID K260Q
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Kepler
Code name	Pitcairn	GK104
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	13 June 2012	28 June 2013
Pipelines	1280	1536
Core clock speed	950 MHz	745 MHz
Transistor count	2,800 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	76.00	95.36
Floating-point performance	2,432 gflops	2,289 gflops
Length	242 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	4800 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	153.6 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA		3.0
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	285 Mh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)	6 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
StereoOutput3D	+
DisplayPort count	4
Dual-link DVI support	+
	Check Price

FirePro W7000 vs GRID K260Q

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares