FireStream 9250 vs GRID K260Q

When choosing between FireStream 9250 and GRID K260Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9250 and GRID K260Q.

FireStream 9250

GRID K260Q

Main Specs

	FireStream 9250	GRID K260Q
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI	No outputs

GRID K260Q has 50% more power consumption, than FireStream 9250.
FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID K260Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GRID K260Q has 1 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GRID K260Q - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GRID K260Q is 120 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GRID K260Q - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 3014 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	2−3	14−16
ultra / 1080p	1−2	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	12−14	30−35
medium / 1080p	5−6	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 280% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	7−8	24−27
ultra / 1080p	5−6	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	18−20	50−55
medium / 1080p	7−8	27−30
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 255% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	35−40	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	120−130	210−220
medium / 768p	95−100	180−190
ultra / 1080p	45−50	95−100
QHD / 1440p	35−40	50−55
4K / 2160p	18−20	30−33
high / 768p	70−75	140−150
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 83% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	80−85	55−60
ultra / 1080p	18−20	40−45
medium / 1080p	50−55	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
medium / 768p	50−55	90−95
ultra / 1080p	27−30	60−65
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 73% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	3−4	18−20
ultra / 1080p	3−4	16−18
4K / 2160p	1−2	6−7
low / 720p	12−14	35−40
medium / 1080p	4−5	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 280% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	10−12	24−27
ultra / 1080p	6−7	18−20
QHD / 1440p	3−4	16−18
low / 720p	50−55	95−100
medium / 1080p	14−16	50−55
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 147% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	8−9	24−27
ultra / 1080p	6−7	20−22
QHD / 1440p	0−1	9−10
low / 720p	20−22	50−55
medium / 1080p	10−11	27−30
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 181% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	50−55	85−90
medium / 768p	−	75−80
high / 1080p	8−9	30−33
ultra / 1080p	3−4	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
medium / 720p	40−45	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 109% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	2−3	9−10
ultra / 1080p	0−1	7−8
4K / 2160p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	7−8	27−30
medium / 1080p	4−5	12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 325% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	85−90	110−120
high / 1080p	85−90	−
ultra / 1080p	85−90	100−110
4K / 2160p	75−80	−
medium / 1080p	−	100−110
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 26% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	14−16	21−24
ultra / 1080p	12−14	18−20
low / 720p	27−30	55−60
medium / 1080p	14−16	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 82% more, than FireStream 9250.
high / 1080p	6−7	14−16
ultra / 1080p	4−5	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
4K / 2160p	0−1	−
low / 720p	7−8	27−30
medium / 1080p	7−8	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 183% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	16−18	55−60
medium / 768p	12−14	30−35
high / 1080p	6−7	18−20
ultra / 1080p	4−5	10−12
4K / 2160p	2−3	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 212% more, than FireStream 9250.
low / 768p	80−85	100−110
medium / 768p	40−45	60−65
ultra / 1080p	16−18	35−40
high / 768p	30−35	50−55
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 48% more, than FireStream 9250.

Full Specs

	FireStream 9250	GRID K260Q
Architecture	TeraScale	Kepler
Code name	RV770	GK104
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	16 June 2008	28 June 2013
Pipelines	800	1536
Core clock speed	625 MHz	745 MHz
Transistor count	956 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	25.00	95.36
Floating-point performance	1,000.0 gflops	2,289 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1986 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	63.55 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	4.1	5.1
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA		3.0

FireStream 9250 vs GRID K260Q

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares