FireStream 9270 vs GRID K260Q

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9270 and GRID K260Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9270 and GRID K260Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

FireStream 9270

GRID K260Q

Main Specs

	FireStream 9270	GRID K260Q
Power consumption (TDP)	160 Watt	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI	No outputs

GRID K260Q has 40% more power consumption, than FireStream 9270.
FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID K260Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
FireStream 9270 and GRID K260Q have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GRID K260Q - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 5 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GRID K260Q - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 1400 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	5−6	14−16
ultra / 1080p	2−3	9−10
QHD / 1440p	2−3	3−4
low / 720p	14−16	30−35
medium / 1080p	7−8	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	10−11	24−27
ultra / 1080p	8−9	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	21−24	50−55
medium / 1080p	10−12	27−30
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 146% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FireStream 9270 and GRID K260Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	130−140	210−220
medium / 768p	100−110	180−190
ultra / 1080p	50−55	95−100
QHD / 1440p	27−30	50−55
4K / 2160p	12−14	30−33
high / 768p	75−80	140−150
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 77% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	50−55	55−60
ultra / 1080p	18−20	40−45
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	80−85	110−120
medium / 768p	55−60	90−95
ultra / 1080p	30−35	60−65
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 57% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	7−8	18−20
ultra / 1080p	5−6	16−18
4K / 2160p	5−6	6−7
low / 720p	16−18	35−40
medium / 1080p	8−9	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 137% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	7−8	24−27
ultra / 1080p	0−1	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
low / 720p	55−60	95−100
medium / 1080p	18−20	50−55
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 107% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	10−11	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	9−10
4K / 2160p	8−9	−
low / 720p	21−24	50−55
medium / 1080p	12−14	27−30
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	50−55	85−90
medium / 768p	−	75−80
high / 1080p	10−12	30−33
ultra / 1080p	5−6	12−14
QHD / 1440p	−	3−4
medium / 720p	45−50	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 91% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	3−4	9−10
ultra / 1080p	1−2	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	10−11	27−30
medium / 1080p	5−6	12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 180% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	90−95	110−120
ultra / 1080p	80−85	100−110
medium / 1080p	−	100−110
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 26% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	6−7	21−24
ultra / 1080p	2−3	18−20
4K / 2160p	0−1	−
low / 720p	27−30	55−60
medium / 1080p	10−11	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 158% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	10−11	27−30
medium / 1080p	9−10	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 120% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	21−24	55−60
medium / 768p	14−16	30−35
high / 1080p	6−7	18−20
ultra / 1080p	4−5	10−12
4K / 2160p	3−4	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 150% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p	75−80	100−110
medium / 768p	40−45	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	35−40
high / 768p	30−35	50−55
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 52% more, than FireStream 9270.

Full Specs

	FireStream 9270	GRID K260Q
Architecture	TeraScale	Kepler
Code name	RV770	GK104
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	13 November 2008	28 June 2013
Pipelines	800	1536
Core clock speed	750 MHz	745 MHz
Transistor count	956 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	30.00	95.36
Floating-point performance	1,200.0 gflops	2,289 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	3600 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	115.2 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	4.1	5.1
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA		3.0

FireStream 9270 vs GRID K260Q

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares