FireStream 9370 vs GRID K260Q

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9370 and GRID K260Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9370 and GRID K260Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

FireStream 9370

GRID K260Q

Main Specs

	FireStream 9370	GRID K260Q
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort	No outputs

Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 225 Watt.
FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID K260Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
FireStream 9370 has 2 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GRID K260Q - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 80 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K260Q - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 400 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	12−14	14−16
ultra / 1080p	7−8	9−10
QHD / 1440p	2−3	3−4
low / 720p	27−30	30−35
medium / 1080p	16−18	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 15% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p	21−24	24−27
ultra / 1080p	18−20	21−24
QHD / 1440p	4−5	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	45−50	50−55
medium / 1080p	21−24	27−30
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 17% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FireStream 9370 and GRID K260Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	190−200	210−220
medium / 768p	160−170	180−190
ultra / 1080p	85−90	95−100
QHD / 1440p	45−50	50−55
4K / 2160p	30−33	30−33
high / 768p	120−130	140−150
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	35−40	40−45
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p	100−110	110−120
medium / 768p	85−90	90−95
ultra / 1080p	55−60	60−65
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 8% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p	14−16	18−20
ultra / 1080p	14−16	16−18
4K / 2160p	5−6	6−7
low / 720p	30−35	35−40
medium / 1080p	16−18	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 11% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p	21−24	24−27
ultra / 1080p	16−18	18−20
QHD / 1440p	16−18	16−18
low / 720p	85−90	95−100
medium / 1080p	45−50	50−55
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 10% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p	21−24	24−27
ultra / 1080p	16−18	20−22
QHD / 1440p	7−8	9−10
low / 720p	45−50	50−55
medium / 1080p	24−27	27−30
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 12% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p	75−80	85−90
medium / 768p	65−70	75−80
high / 1080p	24−27	30−33
ultra / 1080p	10−11	12−14
QHD / 1440p	1−2	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 16% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p	8−9	9−10
ultra / 1080p	6−7	7−8
4K / 2160p	2−3	2−3
low / 720p	24−27	27−30
medium / 1080p	10−12	12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p	100−110	110−120
ultra / 1080p	95−100	100−110
medium / 1080p	100−110	100−110
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 5% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p	21−24	21−24
ultra / 1080p	16−18	18−20
low / 720p	50−55	55−60
medium / 1080p	21−24	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p	12−14	14−16
ultra / 1080p	9−10	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	24−27	27−30
medium / 1080p	14−16	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 13% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p	45−50	55−60
medium / 768p	27−30	30−35
high / 1080p	16−18	18−20
ultra / 1080p	9−10	10−12
4K / 2160p	7−8	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 13% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p	95−100	100−110
medium / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	30−35	35−40
high / 768p	50−55	50−55
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 6% more, than FireStream 9370.

Full Specs

	FireStream 9370	GRID K260Q
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Kepler
Code name	Cypress	GK104
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	23 June 2010	28 June 2013
Pipelines	1600	1536
Core clock speed	825 MHz	745 MHz
Transistor count	2,154 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	66.00	95.36
Floating-point performance	2,640.0 gflops	2,289 gflops
Length	267 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	4600 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	147.2 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA		3.0

FireStream 9370 vs GRID K260Q

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares