GeForce 820A vs GRID K260Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce 820A and GRID K260Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce 820A and GRID K260Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce 820A
GRID K260Q
Main Specs
| GeForce 820A | GRID K260Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID K260Q has 1400% more power consumption, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID K260Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID K260Q has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce 820A.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce 820A is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and GRID K260Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 820A is 30 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
- GeForce 820A and GRID K260Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce 820A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3100% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 471% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 255% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 340% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 357% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 612% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | − | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 192% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 820A | GRID K260Q | |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | GF117 | GK104 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 96 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 12.40 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 2.1 | 3.0 |