GeForce 845M vs GRID K260Q
In this comparison between GeForce 845M and GRID K260Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 845M will be the best choice, for others GRID K260Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K260Q
GeForce 845M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 845M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 845M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 845M | GRID K260Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K260Q has 400% more power consumption, than GeForce 845M.
- GeForce 845M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID K260Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 845M and GRID K260Q have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce 845M is used in Laptops, and GRID K260Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce 845M is build with Maxwell architecture, and GRID K260Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 845M is 326 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
- GeForce 845M and GRID K260Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 3000 MHz higher, than GeForce 845M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 166% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 845M and GRID K260Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 77% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 845M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 69% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 216% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 114% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 145% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 180% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 19% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 181% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 144% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 177% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 52% more, than GeForce 845M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 845M | GRID K260Q | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Code name | GM108 | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 March 2014 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 1071 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 37.63 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 883.7 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 - 5000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |