GeForce 920MX vs GRID K260Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce 920MX and GRID K260Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce 920MX stacks up against GRID K260Q, check out specs charts below.
GRID K260Q
GeForce 920MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 920MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 920MX here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 920MX | GRID K260Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 16 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K260Q has 1306% more power consumption, than GeForce 920MX.
- GeForce 920MX is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID K260Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 920MX and GRID K260Q have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce 920MX is used in Laptops, and GRID K260Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce 920MX is build with Maxwell architecture, and GRID K260Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920MX is 220 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
- GeForce 920MX and GRID K260Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce 920MX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 277% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 920MX and GRID K260Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 92% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| GeForce 920MX and GRID K260Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 76% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 162% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 27% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 280% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 328% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 56% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 920MX | GRID K260Q | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Code name | N16V-GMR | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 25 March 2015 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 256 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 965 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 993 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.83 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 602.1 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |