GeForce GT 645M vs GRID K260Q
When choosing between GeForce GT 645M and GRID K260Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GT 645M and GRID K260Q.
GRID K260Q
GeForce GT 645M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 645M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 645M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 645M | GRID K260Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 32 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | DDR3\GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K260Q has 603% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 645M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GT 645M and GRID K260Q have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GT 645M is used in Laptops, and GRID K260Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 645M and GRID K260Q are build with Kepler architecture.
- GeForce GT 645M and GRID K260Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 645M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 340% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 385% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 645M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 116% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 95% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 475% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 206% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 337% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 175% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 750% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 82% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 375% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
| low / 768p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 500% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 68% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 645M | GRID K260Q | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | N13P-GS | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 22 March 2012 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 22.7 billion/sec | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 544.5 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| CUDA cores | 384 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| HDMI | + | |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| 3D Blu-Ray | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 19 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |