GeForce GT 755M vs GRID K260Q
When choosing between GeForce GT 755M and GRID K260Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GT 755M and GRID K260Q.
GRID K260Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GT 755M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 755M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 755M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 755M | GRID K260Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K260Q has 350% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 755M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GT 755M has 2 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
- GeForce GT 755M is used in Laptops, and GRID K260Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 755M and GRID K260Q are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 755M is 235 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
- GeForce GT 755M and GRID K260Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 755M is 400 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 90% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GT 755M and GRID K260Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 85−90 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 57% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 45% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 72% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 60% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 92% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 57% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 17% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 63% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 78% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 33% more, than GeForce GT 755M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 755M | GRID K260Q | |
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Code name | N14P- | GK104 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 25 June 2013 | 28 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 745 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.36 | 95.36 |
Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 3.0 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |