GeForce GTS 360M vs GRID K260Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTS 360M and GRID K260Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTS 360M and GRID K260Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K260Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTS 360M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTS 360M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 360M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTS 360M | GRID K260Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 38 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | MXM-II | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K260Q has 492% more power consumption, than GeForce GTS 360M.
- GeForce GTS 360M is connected by MXM-II, and GRID K260Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID K260Q has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 360M.
- GeForce GTS 360M is used in Laptops, and GRID K260Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTS 360M is build with GT2xx architecture, and GRID K260Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 360M is 691 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
- GeForce GTS 360M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K260Q - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3100% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 360M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 471% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 360M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 255% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 340% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 357% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 612% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | − | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 192% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTS 360M | GRID K260Q | |
Architecture | GT2xx | Kepler |
Code name | N11E-GS1 | GK104 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 7 January 2010 | 28 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 96 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 1436 MHz | 745 MHz |
Transistor count | 727 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.60 | 95.36 |
Floating-point performance | 275.71 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 3.0 |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Gigaflops | 413 | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
Power management | 8.0 | |
Check Price |