GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs GRID K260Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 460 768MB and GRID K260Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 460 768MB stacks up against GRID K260Q, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 460 768MB
GRID K260Q
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 768MB | GRID K260Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 460 768MB is build with Fermi architecture, and GRID K260Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID K260Q is 70 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 460 768MB and GRID K260Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 768MB | GRID K260Q | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
| Code name | GK104 | |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | no data | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 336 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 675 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| DirectX | 11 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |