GeForce GTX 560M vs GRID K260Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 560M and GRID K260Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 560M and GRID K260Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K260Q
GeForce GTX 560M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 560M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 560M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 560M | GRID K260Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K260Q has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 560M.
- GeForce GTX 560M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GRID K260Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 560M has 1534 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
- GeForce GTX 560M is used in Laptops, and GRID K260Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 560M is build with Fermi architecture, and GRID K260Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 560M is 30 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
- GeForce GTX 560M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K260Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 3750 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 560M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 146% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 560M and GRID K260Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 77% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 137% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 107% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 91% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 180% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 181% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 120% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 177% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 52% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 560M | GRID K260Q | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
| Code name | N12E-GS | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 30 May 2011 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 24.8 billion/sec | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 595.2 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| CUDA cores | 192 | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| 3D Blu-Ray | + | |
| 3D Gaming | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 44 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |