GeForce GTX 660M vs GRID K260Q
When choosing between GeForce GTX 660M and GRID K260Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 660M and GRID K260Q.
GRID K260Q
GeForce GTX 660M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 660M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 660M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 660M | GRID K260Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K260Q has 350% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 660M.
- GeForce GTX 660M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GRID K260Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 660M and GRID K260Q have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 660M is used in Laptops, and GRID K260Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 660M and GRID K260Q are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 660M is 90 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
- GeForce GTX 660M and GRID K260Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 3000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 660M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 111% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 113% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 660M and GRID K260Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 65% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 19% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 111% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 77% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 107% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 79% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 133% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| low / 768p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 92% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 660M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 660M | GRID K260Q | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | N13E-GE | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 22 March 2012 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 835 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 950 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.4 billion/sec | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 729.6 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| CUDA cores | 384 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 36 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |