GeForce GTX 670 vs GRID K260Q

When choosing between GeForce GTX 670 and GRID K260Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 670 and GRID K260Q.

GeForce GTX 670 Check Price

GRID K260Q

Main Specs

	GeForce GTX 670	GRID K260Q
Power consumption (TDP)	170 Watt	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	Two 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price

GRID K260Q has 32% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 670.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
GeForce GTX 670 and GRID K260Q have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 670 and GRID K260Q are build with Kepler architecture.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 670 is 235 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
GeForce GTX 670 and GRID K260Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 4994 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	35−40	14−16
ultra / 1080p	21−24	9−10
QHD / 1440p	16−18	3−4
4K / 2160p	10−11	−
low / 720p	60−65	30−35
medium / 1080p	40−45	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	55−60	24−27
ultra / 1080p	45−50	21−24
QHD / 1440p	35−40	7−8
4K / 2160p	18−20	5−6
low / 720p	100−110	50−55
medium / 1080p	60−65	27−30
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Battlefield 5 is 134% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	250−260	210−220
medium / 768p	220−230	180−190
ultra / 1080p	180−190	95−100
QHD / 1440p	110−120	50−55
4K / 2160p	70−75	30−33
high / 768p	210−220	140−150
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	60−65	55−60
ultra / 1080p	−	40−45
medium / 1080p	55−60	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	120−130	110−120
medium / 768p	110−120	90−95
ultra / 1080p	100−110	60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Dota 2 is 27% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	45−50	18−20
ultra / 1080p	40−45	16−18
QHD / 1440p	27−30	−
4K / 2160p	14−16	6−7
low / 720p	80−85	35−40
medium / 1080p	45−50	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Far Cry 5 is 147% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	60−65	24−27
ultra / 1080p	45−50	18−20
QHD / 1440p	27−30	16−18
4K / 2160p	27−30	−
low / 720p	180−190	95−100
medium / 1080p	110−120	50−55
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Fortnite is 107% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	60−65	24−27
ultra / 1080p	45−50	20−22
QHD / 1440p	30−35	9−10
4K / 2160p	24−27	−
low / 720p	100−110	50−55
medium / 1080p	65−70	27−30
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	140−150	85−90
medium / 768p	120−130	75−80
high / 1080p	70−75	30−33
ultra / 1080p	30−35	12−14
QHD / 1440p	21−24	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Grand Theft Auto V is 88% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	9−10
ultra / 1080p	20−22	7−8
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	2−3
low / 720p	65−70	27−30
medium / 1080p	30−35	12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Metro Exodus is 158% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	130−140	110−120
ultra / 1080p	−	100−110
medium / 1080p	120−130	100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	14−16	18−20
low / 720p	100−110	55−60
medium / 1080p	18−20	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	14−16
ultra / 1080p	16−18	9−10
QHD / 1440p	10−11	0−1
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
low / 720p	65−70	27−30
medium / 1080p	35−40	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	130−140	55−60
medium / 768p	85−90	30−35
high / 1080p	45−50	18−20
ultra / 1080p	24−27	10−12
4K / 2160p	16−18	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 148% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	90−95	100−110
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	50−55	35−40
high / 768p	60−65	50−55
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in World of Tanks is 4% more, than GRID K260Q.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTX 670	GRID K260Q
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Code name	GK104	GK104
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	10 May 2012	28 June 2013
Pipelines	1344	1536
Core clock speed	980 MHz	745 MHz
Boost Clock	980 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	102.5 billion/sec	95.36
Floating-point performance	2,459.5 gflops	2,289 gflops
Length	9.5" (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width	256-bit GDDR5	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	6.0 GB/s	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.2 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.2	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	+	3.0
CUDA cores	1344
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options	+
Multi monitor support	4 displays
HDMI	+
HDCP	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	Internal
3D Blu-Ray	+
3D Gaming	+
3D Vision	+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	97 Mh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)	13 Mh/s
	Check Price

GeForce GTX 670 vs GRID K260Q

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares