GeForce GTX 860M vs GRID K260Q
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 860M and GRID K260Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 860M will be the best choice, for others GRID K260Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K260Q
GeForce GTX 860M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 860M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 860M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 860M | GRID K260Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K260Q has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 860M.
- GeForce GTX 860M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GRID K260Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 860M has 2 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
- GeForce GTX 860M is used in Laptops, and GRID K260Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 860M is build with Maxwell architecture, and GRID K260Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 860M is 52 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
- GeForce GTX 860M and GRID K260Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 13% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Battlefield 5 is 13% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 860M and GRID K260Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GeForce GTX 860M and GRID K260Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 100−105 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Dota 2 is 5% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Far Cry 5 is 15% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Fortnite is 9% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Forza Horizon 4 is 11% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Grand Theft Auto V is 7% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Metro Exodus is 16% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
GeForce GTX 860M and GRID K260Q have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 12% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in World of Tanks is 1% more, than GRID K260Q. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 860M | GRID K260Q | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Code name | N15P-GX | GK104 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 12 March 2014 | 28 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 640 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 797 MHz | 745 MHz |
Boost Clock | 915 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.40 | 95.36 |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 3.0 |
CUDA cores | 1152 or 640 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |