GeForce GTX 870M vs GRID K260Q
When comparing GeForce GTX 870M and GRID K260Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 870M and GRID K260Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K260Q
GeForce GTX 870M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 870M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 870M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 870M | GRID K260Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K260Q has 125% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 870M.
- GeForce GTX 870M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GRID K260Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 870M has 4 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
- GeForce GTX 870M is used in Laptops, and GRID K260Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 870M and GRID K260Q are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 870M is 196 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
- GeForce GTX 870M and GRID K260Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Battlefield 5 is 17% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 7% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Dota 2 is 7% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Far Cry 5 is 21% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Fortnite is 14% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Forza Horizon 4 is 18% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Grand Theft Auto V is 14% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Metro Exodus is 16% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Minecraft is 4% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 20% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 870M | GRID K260Q | |
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Code name | N15P-GT | GK104 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 12 March 2014 | 28 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 1344 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 941 MHz | 745 MHz |
Boost Clock | 967 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 108.3 | 95.36 |
Floating-point performance | 2,599 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 120.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 3.0 |
CUDA cores | 1344 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 82 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |