GeForce MX250 vs GRID K260Q
When comparing GeForce MX250 and GRID K260Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce MX250 and GRID K260Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K260Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce MX250 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX250 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX250 here:
Main Specs
GeForce MX250 | GRID K260Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K260Q has 2150% more power consumption, than GeForce MX250.
- GeForce MX250 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x4, and GRID K260Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce MX250 has 2 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
- GeForce MX250 is used in Laptops, and GRID K260Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX250 is build with Pascal architecture, and GRID K260Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 773 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
- GeForce MX250 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and GRID K260Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 2000 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 15% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 15% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce MX250 and GRID K260Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 8% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 5% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 7% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 12% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 13% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 3% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 13% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 13% more, than GeForce MX250. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GeForce MX250. |
Full Specs
GeForce MX250 | GRID K260Q | |
Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
Code name | N17S-G2 | GK104 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 20 February 2019 | 28 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 1518 MHz | 745 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1582 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,800 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 24.91 | 95.36 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 6.1 | 3.0 |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |