GRID K220Q vs GRID K260Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID K220Q and GRID K260Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID K220Q and GRID K260Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K220Q
GRID K260Q
Main Specs
GRID K220Q | GRID K260Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 225 Watt.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID K220Q has 510 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K220Q and GRID K260Q are build with Kepler architecture.
- Both graphics cards have the same core clock speed.
- GRID K220Q and GRID K260Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K220Q and GRID K260Q is 5000 MHz.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 340% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 385% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 116% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 104% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 475% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 206% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 337% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 175% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 750% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 32% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 82% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 375% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 7−8 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 620% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 68% more, than GRID K220Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K220Q | GRID K260Q | |
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Code name | GK104 | GK104 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 2 July 2014 | 28 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 745 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 95.36 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.0 | 3.0 |