GRID K240Q vs GRID K260Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K240Q and GRID K260Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K240Q stacks up against GRID K260Q, check out specs charts below.
GRID K240Q
GRID K260Q
Main Specs
GRID K240Q | GRID K260Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 225 Watt.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID K260Q has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K240Q and GRID K260Q are build with Kepler architecture.
- Both graphics cards have the same core clock speed.
- GRID K240Q and GRID K260Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q and GRID K260Q is 5000 MHz.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 45% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K240Q and GRID K260Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 110−120 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 21% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 35% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 29% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 42% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 30% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 8% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 30% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 38% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 16% more, than GRID K240Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K240Q | GRID K260Q | |
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Code name | GK104 | GK104 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 28 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 745 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 95.36 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.0 | 3.0 |