GRID K260Q vs GRID M60 2Q

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K260Q and GRID M60 2Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K260Q stacks up against GRID M60 2Q, check out specs charts below.

GRID K260Q

GRID M60 2Q

Main Specs

	GRID K260Q	GRID M60 2Q
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs

Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 225 Watt.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
GRID K260Q and GRID M60 2Q have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and GRID M60 2Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of GRID K260Q is 188 MHz higher, than GRID M60 2Q.
GRID K260Q and GRID M60 2Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID M60 2Q is 12 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	35−40
ultra / 1080p	9−10	21−24
QHD / 1440p	3−4	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	30−35	60−65
medium / 1080p	18−20	40−45
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	55−60
ultra / 1080p	21−24	45−50
QHD / 1440p	7−8	35−40
4K / 2160p	5−6	18−20
low / 720p	50−55	100−110
medium / 1080p	27−30	60−65
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Battlefield 5 is 134% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	210−220	250−260
medium / 768p	180−190	220−230
ultra / 1080p	95−100	180−190
QHD / 1440p	50−55	110−120
4K / 2160p	30−33	70−75
high / 768p	140−150	210−220
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	−
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	110−120	120−130
medium / 768p	90−95	110−120
ultra / 1080p	60−65	100−110
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Dota 2 is 27% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	18−20	45−50
ultra / 1080p	16−18	40−45
QHD / 1440p	−	27−30
4K / 2160p	6−7	14−16
low / 720p	35−40	80−85
medium / 1080p	18−20	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Far Cry 5 is 147% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	45−50
QHD / 1440p	16−18	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	95−100	180−190
medium / 1080p	50−55	110−120
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Fortnite is 107% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	60−65
ultra / 1080p	20−22	45−50
QHD / 1440p	9−10	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	24−27
low / 720p	50−55	100−110
medium / 1080p	27−30	65−70
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	85−90	140−150
medium / 768p	75−80	120−130
high / 1080p	30−33	70−75
ultra / 1080p	12−14	30−35
QHD / 1440p	3−4	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 88% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	9−10	24−27
ultra / 1080p	7−8	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	2−3	8−9
low / 720p	27−30	65−70
medium / 1080p	12−14	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Metro Exodus is 158% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	110−120	130−140
ultra / 1080p	100−110	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	120−130
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Minecraft is 18% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	100−110
medium / 1080p	24−27	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	14−16	24−27
ultra / 1080p	9−10	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	27−30	65−70
medium / 1080p	16−18	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	55−60	130−140
medium / 768p	30−35	85−90
high / 1080p	18−20	45−50
ultra / 1080p	10−12	24−27
4K / 2160p	8−9	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 148% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	100−110	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	50−55
high / 768p	50−55	60−65
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in World of Tanks is 4% more, than GRID K260Q.

Full Specs

	GRID K260Q	GRID M60 2Q
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	GK104	GM204
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	28 June 2013	30 August 2015
Pipelines	1536	2048
Core clock speed	745 MHz	557 MHz
Boost Clock		1178 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	150.8
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops	4,833 gflops
Length		267 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	160.4 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0	5.2

GRID K260Q vs GRID M60 2Q

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares