GRID K260Q vs HD Graphics 630

In this comparison between GRID K260Q and HD Graphics 630 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K260Q will be the best choice, for others HD Graphics 630 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GRID K260Q

HD Graphics 630

Main Specs

	GRID K260Q	HD Graphics 630
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	15 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x1
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	64 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs

GRID K260Q has 1400% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 630.
GRID K260Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and HD Graphics 630 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
HD Graphics 630 has 62 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and HD Graphics 630 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
Core clock speed of GRID K260Q is 445 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 630.
GRID K260Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and HD Graphics 630 - by 14 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	3−4
ultra / 1080p	9−10	1−2
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	14−16
medium / 1080p	18−20	5−6
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than HD Graphics 630.
high / 1080p	24−27	7−8
ultra / 1080p	21−24	5−6
QHD / 1440p	7−8	0−1
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	50−55	18−20
medium / 1080p	27−30	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 220% more, than HD Graphics 630.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GRID K260Q and HD Graphics 630 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	210−220	120−130
medium / 768p	180−190	95−100
ultra / 1080p	95−100	45−50
QHD / 1440p	50−55	24−27
4K / 2160p	30−33	−
high / 768p	140−150	70−75
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 90% more, than HD Graphics 630.
low / 768p	55−60	70−75
ultra / 1080p	40−45	20−22
medium / 1080p	45−50	40−45
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than HD Graphics 630.
low / 768p	110−120	75−80
medium / 768p	90−95	55−60
ultra / 1080p	60−65	27−30
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 66% more, than HD Graphics 630.
high / 1080p	18−20	3−4
ultra / 1080p	16−18	3−4
4K / 2160p	6−7	0−1
low / 720p	35−40	14−16
medium / 1080p	18−20	5−6
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 283% more, than HD Graphics 630.
high / 1080p	24−27	12−14
ultra / 1080p	18−20	7−8
QHD / 1440p	16−18	4−5
low / 720p	95−100	55−60
medium / 1080p	50−55	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 121% more, than HD Graphics 630.
high / 1080p	24−27	6−7
ultra / 1080p	20−22	6−7
QHD / 1440p	9−10	0−1
low / 720p	50−55	20−22
medium / 1080p	27−30	9−10
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 210% more, than HD Graphics 630.
low / 768p	85−90	45−50
medium / 768p	75−80	−
high / 1080p	30−33	8−9
ultra / 1080p	12−14	3−4
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
medium / 720p	−	40−45
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 131% more, than HD Graphics 630.
high / 1080p	9−10	2−3
ultra / 1080p	7−8	0−1
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	7−8
medium / 1080p	12−14	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 325% more, than HD Graphics 630.
low / 768p	110−120	85−90
high / 1080p	−	65−70
ultra / 1080p	100−110	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 32% more, than HD Graphics 630.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	12−14
low / 720p	55−60	27−30
medium / 1080p	24−27	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than HD Graphics 630.
high / 1080p	14−16	6−7
ultra / 1080p	9−10	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	7−8
medium / 1080p	16−18	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 183% more, than HD Graphics 630.
low / 768p	55−60	16−18
medium / 768p	30−35	12−14
high / 1080p	18−20	6−7
ultra / 1080p	10−12	4−5
4K / 2160p	8−9	1−2
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 212% more, than HD Graphics 630.
low / 768p	100−110	70−75
medium / 768p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	35−40	16−18
high / 768p	50−55	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 64% more, than HD Graphics 630.

Full Specs

	GRID K260Q	HD Graphics 630
Architecture	Kepler	Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Code name	GK104	Kaby-Lake-H-GT2
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	28 June 2013	1 January 2017
Pipelines	1536	24
Core clock speed	745 MHz	300 MHz
Boost Clock		1150 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	26.40
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops	441.6 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.103
CUDA	3.0
Quick Sync		+

GRID K260Q vs HD Graphics 630

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares