GRID K260Q vs HD Graphics P630
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K260Q and HD Graphics P630, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K260Q stacks up against HD Graphics P630, check out specs charts below.
GRID K260Q
HD Graphics P630
Main Specs
GRID K260Q | HD Graphics P630 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1740 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID K260Q has 1400% more power consumption, than HD Graphics P630.
- GRID K260Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and HD Graphics P630 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- HD Graphics P630 has 1738 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and HD Graphics P630 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- GRID K260Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and HD Graphics P630 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 220% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID K260Q and HD Graphics P630 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 90% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 66% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 283% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 121% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 210% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 131% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 325% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 32% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 183% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 212% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 64% more, than HD Graphics P630. |
Full Specs
GRID K260Q | HD Graphics P630 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
Code name | GK104 | Kaby-Lake-H-GT2 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 5 August 2016 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 24 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 26.40 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.103 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Quick Sync | + | |